Holocaust 2, the remake by the media and terrorism.
What we've witnessed 11th september is so enormous that most of the people think it is not real. That was my own reaction when I heard the news. Later in bed, I realized that probably 20,000 people had been killed at once. Even that, is too abstract to realize what it means. The media shows its standard incompetence, by giving only the number of bodies retrieved until now (less than 1,000). But, I know the truth, this is like the holocaust, everybody is in denial. Some of the most productive people on earth have been erased by the scum of the world again, this is what has happened.
Of these top notch people (mostly finance and services), due to the fact that New York is the first Jewish town on earth, around half of them were of my brethren. The people who thought that anti-Zionism is different from anti-Semitism, can shut up now, thank you.
I couldn't cry properly, but I couldn't sleep also, so I started to write to fix the record, which has been constantly distorted, and I'll explain why. Let me come back, on the figure. This size is close to the number of instant deaths in Nagasaki (more people died later of radiations), and that was done to avoid a longer war with fanatic Japan (they still don't acknowledge the fact). The casualties were so high in Okinawa, that an invasion of Japan, was estimated to cost million of lives.
Incompetent media
I want to evacuate several mistakes I have heard in the news. This is NOT comparable to Pearl Harbor. Pearl Harbor was a military objective, attacked by a known country, and killed "only" 2,500 people. This is a civilian objective, in a country at peace, and one person has decided to wage jihad "alone" (not so, as I'll show later).
An other mistake I heard from the supposedly well informed media, is how could it happen? It was nearly impossible for the intelligence services to guess it would happen, because the West relies totally on technology to monitor suspect activities. This is O.K for organized crime (because they always need a legal facade), and most of the countries, but the lower the technology of the country, the more difficult it is to monitor remotely (Iraq escapes a lot, still). This rule applies even more to guerillas.
They are difficult and very dangerous to infiltrate. But human surveillance is still possible through intermediaries. Unfortunately, due to the Western obsession of cleanliness, these agents have disappeared, because you aren't supposed to do that, are we told by pacifists who never fought any war.
Airport security is not an issue, it could have happened anywhere else in the world, but Israel. What happened probably, is either corruption of maintenance people to put a package in the plane. They were told it was drug, or the persons were supportive of the Muslim cause (for what it means). You have always people convinced to "good" causes, thanks to the media which repeats dumbly propaganda (I'll come back on this).
The hijackers came in as normal passengers, and retrieved the weapons. Then they went to the cockpit, and killed both pilots (no warning was emitted), and took the stick. It means at least one hijacker had been trained to pilot these planes. He had only to change course and slam the plane.
All it comes down is, it is nearly impossible to stop anyone who is willing to kill himself. Ask an American who tried to kill kamikazes. This is why Israel, which is extremely well monitored (its citizens are always on the watch), can't avoid these "ants".
This tactic was invented by Lebanese Shiites during the Crusades, and because the slaves (there is no other word) took hashish (to see the paradise they'll reach later), they were called hashishin, therefore assassins. Nothing new, under the sun. Saladdin narrowly escaped such a killer, and went after the mastermind. This is the ONLY solution, and it is the one which was denied to Israel by the same pacifists than before. Sorry guys, the world has plenty of really MAD people.
Now, what can be reproached to CIA and FBI, is that they didn't examine more carefully the rehearsal of 1994 in France. The GIA (Groupe Islamique Armé), an other terrorist structure, from Algeria, hijacked an Air France plane to drop it on Paris. But it got stormed by French elite troops, while refueling in Marseilles. Terrorists learned their lesson, but not the overconfident specialists. Also, politicians accepted, little by little, terrorism as a normal way to vent frustration (but not excessive car speed, it beats me why), so they relaxed their awareness. The CIA chief buddy with Arafat!?
A "final" mistake I heard. It is supposedly a retaliation to the elimination of an other terrorist by Israel. With the explanation I gave, it is pretty obvious that a lot of money and planning has gone into this disaster. It would have happened anyway, it was more a question of when, than anything else. It was the same thing with the Temple Mount Intifadah, after Sharon's visit. It was an excuse, but the whole media industry repeated propaganda by sheer laziness (even Arafat recognized it LATER, but it wasn't news anymore, so why bother to correct ?)
The obvious and the not so obvious responsibles
Let's name names, because several are not going to admit it, as nobody wants to admit guilt (only REAL people do that for themselves, most often it is others who admit it for you!)
Hollywood, The TV industry, The newspaper industry, A few "smart" writers, Middle-age clerics, Demagogic politicians, A deranged mind.
Unlike everybody else I consider the accomplices as brain washed people, due to the help of all the above, and money. They were tools, not the true origin.
An animal, not a human
I'll start by the latter, who is of the magnitude of Hitler. Informed people know who it is, but as there is no direct proof (he is the ultimate coward), we have to wait until it is deduced officially. As Hitler, he stated clearly his intentions, and simultaneously refused the responsibilities. Therefore, we will have the same denials, in front of such a disproportionate killing of innocent people : from the rare wounded left, from their families, from the rest of the world, from the religious and politicians war mongers, from the nostalgic and hate lovers, and from the "good" Samaritans. There will be even people pretending it NEVER happened: it was played in a studio, you know. And by the way, the Jews, and the Americans deserved it, because they started the whole thing, and are "rich" (to be "rich" is wrong for the media).
I reply in advance, a paranoid projects its own behavior on the others. It is for the good that he does bad. Anyway, the "adversary" plotted against him, so it justifies anything. The fact that the victims are in no way directly responsible, nor that the killing was in anyway proportionate to what he supposedly supported before, is irrelevant to him. He has a childish reasoning, but totally perverted by a man's logic. What makes Hitler so horrible, is the detailed plan done by his sub-servant people, who applied all their skills to achieve the most horrible results. The perpetrator is in fact an animal, but he doesn't see his victims, therefore they don't exist.
Hollywood and TV
Hollywood played a BIG role with its special effects The more violence, the better, as it is in for the money. And only 2 things really pay: sex and violence. Sex can't be shown in the U.S, and other prude places, such as the Muslim countries. So thank you for giving ideas to the above person. Do you recall the number of times you've seen New York destroyed in a movie? Well, it happened, this time. Sorry, a few buildings have been left.
The TV industry, by constantly playing on feelings instead of reasoning, needs really BIG events to live. That was made for CNN, but the reporting was lousy, with incompetent people (beautiful people are not necessarily smart), who stated such inane things that it was confounding. Not ONE cried. In fact, I've seen several reporters in France on the border of smiling: ah, finally the Americans got struck! This is the essence of the so called anti-globalization people. It was deserved as Americans pretend to rule the world, wasn't it?
Newspapers
The newspaper industry, repeated over and over, the Palestinian misinformation, and in this way substantiated all the false claims made by them. It did exactly what it did earlier with the Communist, and Nazi propagandas. The news love tyrants, because they make reporting easy, by providing just one kind of thought. Randolph Hearst, who started the Hispano-American war to sell his papers, and later supported Hitler, would be proud of this industry today. It is a lot more difficult to deal with democratic point of views, as they are diverse and contradictory.
What's the point? Well, they are supposed to bring a deeper view than just report the last idea of the day. They are supposed to bring insight, which is nearly impossible on TV. Especially in weekly magazines, such as Time magazine. In fact, it fed back to the Muslims their own misinformation, therefore they were reinforced in their own mind and behavior. It convinced people who were in their own right, that they were wrong, also (especially Israel)! It is a very efficient tool, because it influences not only the people, but also the politicians, who happen to read intellectuals time to time. This the case with Le Monde in France, the New York Times in the U.S, etc…
How to destroy kit
The "smart" writers, that's a trickier thing to see. The catastrophe designers probably took ideas from disaster books, that explain in great detail how to do maximum harm. Most of the perpetrators are not smart enough initially, but by reading the "good" literature, they understand how to destroy such massive structures as the World Trade Center, that otherwise wouldn't have budged. They have replaced the "How to do Molotov Cocktail" books of 1968 (from Russia with love).
Politicians
What can be said of the majority of the Muslim world leaders? They use inflammatory rhetoric, and feed the media with crap. The masses follow blindly, as most don't even know how to read (Arabic is very ambiguous to read, this is why the Koran has never been translated). Therefore it is easier to manipulate them, because they have basically an oral tradition. It means their mentality is the same than Europe in the 17th century, when people relied on nobles and clergy to view the world! Also a dictator (Turkey and Indonesia are the only major Muslims countries, which can be considered democratic), always blame the others, such as the Jews, or the Americans, because they represent the epitome of the Western world, for their own problems. It is easier than fixing one's economy (because a dictator plunders it).
Europe
I have to make a special mention regarding the European leaders, who dislike their past so much, that we witnessed the Durban conference farce. The Muslim and African countries denounced Zionism as racism, and asked for slavery reparation. The first to deal with African slaves, were the Africans themselves, and the Muslims (they still do it TODAY in Sudan!). The Europeans came later, but they are "richer", so it is a lucrative guilt. Regarding Zionism, if it is racism, I don't understand why pan-Arabism is not.
But, the Europeans don't stop at that. The first banker of the Palestinians are NOT the Muslims themselves. They've pledged only $40 millions, on a half a billion dollar hole in the Palestinian budget, this year. It is Europe! On the hundreds of millions it gives per year, a good deal is diverted into the Intifadah, and the own pockets of Yasser Arafat and his supporters (his wife lives comfortably in Paris, and is invited on French TV to spit at the Jews, not even Israel). It is not enough that we get taxed to fund terrorism by buying gas at the pump (Libya, Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia partially). We Europeans are forced to help the Palestinians, because their own brothers didn't want them (ask Jordan, Lebanon, and Kuwait, who tried them before).
The deep down responsibles
And now, the core of the problem, Middle-age minded clerics. It is them, by interpreting as they wish the ambiguous Koran, that can switch a religion from positive to negative. We are at the demented stage now, thanks to Ayatollah Khomeini and his followers (who are incapable of coming back to reason). He switched a civilized, and moderate Shiite country, Iran, to what it is now.
Unlike what progressives state, the Shah is regretted there now. He was certainly more positive to his people (even with the Savak), and the rest of the world. It is not by chance, that Iran with its massive oil reserves, has to come back on the bond market, for the first time since 1979. It means the country is broke, unlike under the Shah. A very positive revolution indeed!
Iran funds Hizbollah and destabilizes Lebanon (in conjunction with Syria). It kills as it wishes its opponents in Europe (which doesn't protest, see above), like Stalin in his time. Because, of Iran, the whole Muslim world has gone into even greater rigidity, because Sunnis can't be outdone in terms of Sharia (Koranic law), especially Saudi Arabia (it is the origin of Islam). This is why Osama bin Laden (he is Saudi) bankrolled Afghanistan, which is even more dogmatic than Iran. This is why moderate Muslim countries can't make hear their voice, such as Morocco, Kuwait, Abu Dhabi, etc…
What to do
Who am I to say that? Well, frankly I don't think I am worse than our pseudo foreign office experts. Most of them, follow a logic which dates back to the 19th century, and sometimes to the 12th century, in Europe's case! France and the United Kingdom still see themselves as guardians of the Holy Sepulchre (Crusade times), hence the theory of an International Jerusalem. Lebanon (French speaking Christians), and later Syria (where the Algeria mess started, because the Spahis were contaminated by Arab terrorism there) are considered important to French interests, since the previous century. This explains France's foreign office tilt toward the Arabs (supposedly Christians), rather than democratic Israel.
This violence spiral has to stop, which means differentiate the good from the bad Muslims. Europe should support totally the U.S blockade against the bad countries, instead of playing a double game (Iran, Iraq, Palestine). Saudi Arabia has to chose its side this time (Afghanistan or the U.S, which protects the country against Iraq). Syria has to be put under pressure to leave Lebanon, and make peace with Israel, to get help from Europe to put back in order its dismal economy. Yasser Arafat has to be put aside, as he always played against the peace process (Clinton would agree on this). He didn't even change, as promised in Oslo, the PLO chart to destroy Israel!